1962 Zastava 750 vs. 2011 Citroen C3

To start off, 2011 Citroen C3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Citroen C3 (72 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Citroen C3 weights approximately 553 kg more than 1962 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C3 (116 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Zastava 750. (46 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Zastava 750.

Compare all specifications: