1962 Zastava 750 vs. 2011 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2011 Ford Falcon is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Falcon (362 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 338 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford Falcon weights approximately 1099 kg more than 1962 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Falcon (533 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 487 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Zastava 750. (46 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Zastava 750. 2011 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1962 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1962 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: