1962 Zastava 750 vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Zastava 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Zastava 750. (46 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Zastava 750 | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Zastava | Citroen |
| Model | 750 | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 766 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 46 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
