1962 ZAZ Jalta vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 ZAZ Jalta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 ZAZ Jalta would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1962 ZAZ Jalta. (23 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1962 ZAZ Jalta.
Because 1962 ZAZ Jalta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 ZAZ Jalta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 ZAZ Jalta. (44 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 ZAZ Jalta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 ZAZ Jalta | 2011 Holden Epica | |
| Make | ZAZ | Holden |
| Model | Jalta | Epica |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 748 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 23 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 44 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3340 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2700 mm |
