1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 1946 Allard K1
To start off, 1963 Abarth 1300 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1946 Allard K1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1946 Allard K1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Allard K1 weights approximately 437 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 1946 Allard K1 | |
Make | Abarth | Allard |
Model | 1300 | K1 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1067 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 113 L |