1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 1952 Allard Safari
To start off, 1963 Abarth 1300 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1952 Allard Safari. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard Safari weights approximately 846 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 1300 | 1952 Allard Safari | |
| Make | Abarth | Allard |
| Model | 1300 | Safari |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3621 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 6.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1476 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 81 L |
