1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 1952 Jaguar C-Type
To start off, 1963 Abarth 1300 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar C-Type (218 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar C-Type weights approximately 385 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 1300 | 1952 Jaguar C-Type | |
| Make | Abarth | Jaguar |
| Model | 1300 | C-Type |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 218 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2450 mm |
