1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp
To start off, 1963 Abarth 1300 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp weights approximately 969 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 1300 | 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | |
| Make | Abarth | Hudson |
| Model | 1300 | Super Wasp |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 7.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1599 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 75 L |
