1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 1957 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1963 Abarth 1300 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 5,973 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 1300 | 1957 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 1300 | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 5973 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 325 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 75 L |
