1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 1960 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1963 Abarth 1300 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Jaguar XK (187 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Jaguar XK weights approximately 843 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 1300 | 1960 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Abarth | Jaguar |
| Model | 1300 | XK |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1473 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 90 L |
