1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 1972 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1972 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 8,190 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac Eldorado (223 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1590 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 1972 Cadillac Eldorado | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 1300 | Eldorado |
Year Released | 1963 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 8190 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 223 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 101 L |