1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 1980 Renault Fuego
To start off, 1980 Renault Fuego is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,647 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Renault Fuego is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1980 Renault Fuego. (96 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1980 Renault Fuego. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Renault Fuego weights approximately 405 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300.
Because 1963 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Renault Fuego, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 1980 Renault Fuego | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 1300 | Fuego |
Year Released | 1963 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1647 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 56 L |