1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 1981 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1981 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1326 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 1981 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 1300 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1963 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 5032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1956 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3090 mm |