1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 1996 Buick LeSabre
To start off, 1996 Buick LeSabre is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Buick LeSabre (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 860 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 1996 Buick LeSabre | |
Make | Abarth | Buick |
Model | 1300 | LeSabre |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 68 L |