1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2000 Chevrolet SSR
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (300 HP) has 163 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 1520 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2000 Chevrolet SSR | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 1300 | SSR |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 5324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 300 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2950 mm |