1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,956 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee (188 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1204 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | 1300 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 188 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1834 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 87 L |