1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,146 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 910 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2000 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Abarth | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 1300 | C |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2146 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 69 L |