1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2001 AC Cobra
To start off, 2001 AC Cobra is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 AC Cobra (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 AC Cobra weights approximately 430 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2001 AC Cobra | |
Make | Abarth | AC |
Model | 1300 | Cobra |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3506 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2300 mm |