1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 1300 | Cheyenne |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2090 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1950 mm |