1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2003 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2003 Ford Falcon is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Falcon weights approximately 885 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2003 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1300 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 59 L |