1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2004 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Cherokee (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1401 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2004 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | 1300 | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2031 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 70 L |