1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz R (302 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz R weights approximately 1610 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz R is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 1300 | 2005 Mercedes-Benz R | |
| Make | Abarth | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 1300 | R |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 302 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2240 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 80 L |
