1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 1300 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3270 mm |