1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2006 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 2037 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2006 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 1300 | Escalade |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 5967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2667 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 117 L |