1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (200 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300.
Because 1963 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 1300 | 2006 Chevrolet Impala | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1300 | Impala |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 64 L |
