1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2006 Ford Bantam
To start off, 2006 Ford Bantam is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,597 cc, 2006 Ford Bantam is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2006 Ford Bantam. (94 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Bantam weights approximately 614 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300.
Because 1963 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Bantam, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 1300 | 2006 Ford Bantam | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 1300 | Bantam |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1597 cc |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1244 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 54 L |
