1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 618 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1300 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 19.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1248 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 82 L |