1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1012 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1300 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1642 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 74 L |