1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2006 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2006 Smart Roadster is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,280 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Abarth 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2006 Smart Roadster. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart Roadster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Smart Roadster weights approximately 235 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2006 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Abarth | Smart |
Model | 1300 | Roadster |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 35 L |