1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2008 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XJR is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 1215 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 1300 | 2008 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Abarth | Jaguar |
| Model | 1300 | XJR |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.9:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1845 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 81 L |
