1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,725 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 699 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 1300 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3725 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 76 L |