1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2008 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2008 Toyota Camry is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Camry weights approximately 734 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300.
Because 1963 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2008 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 1300 | Camry |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1364 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 70 L |