1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2009 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (254 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1441 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2009 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 1300 | SRX |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 254 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2071 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 76 L |