1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2009 Dodge Nitro
To start off, 2009 Dodge Nitro is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Nitro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Nitro (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Nitro should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Nitro weights approximately 1061 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2009 Dodge Nitro | |
Make | Abarth | Dodge |
Model | 1300 | Nitro |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1691 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 74 L |