1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2009 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2009 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lincoln Navigator (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 1347 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2009 Lincoln Navigator | |
Make | Abarth | Lincoln |
Model | 1300 | Navigator |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1977 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 127 L |