1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,438 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E (469 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 332 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 1205 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2009 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Abarth | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 1300 | E |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 5438 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 469 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1835 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 80 L |