1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2010 Chrysler Town & Country
To start off, 2010 Chrysler Town & Country is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chrysler Town & Country is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chrysler Town & Country (251 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler Town & Country should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300.
Because 1963 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler Town & Country, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2010 Chrysler Town & Country | |
Make | Abarth | Chrysler |
Model | 1300 | Town & Country |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5144 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1953 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1814 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3078 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 76 L |