1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Ram (390 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1706 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Abarth | Dodge |
Model | 1300 | Ram |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2336 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5817 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1908 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3569 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 98 L |