1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2010 Ford E-250
To start off, 2010 Ford E-250 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-250 (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-250, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 1300 | 2010 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 1300 | E-250 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4717 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1702 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2824 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 72 L |
