1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 927 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR weights approximately 650 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1300 | 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
Make | Abarth | Koenigsegg |
Model | 1300 | CCXR |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 1064 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2660 mm |