1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2011 Tata Nano
To start off, 2011 Tata Nano is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,280 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Abarth 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2011 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2011 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Abarth 1300 weights approximately 30 kg more than 2011 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 1300 | 2011 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Abarth | Tata |
| Model | 1300 | Nano |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 37 L |
