1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2012 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2012 Dodge Ram is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 6,690 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Ram (350 HP @ 3013 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1907 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 1300 | 2012 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Abarth | Dodge |
| Model | 1300 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 6690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 3013 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2537 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 6300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 2000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 4080 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 129 L |
