1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1427 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 1300 | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Abarth | Jeep |
| Model | 1300 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 281 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2057 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4684 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1798 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2946 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 85 L |
