1963 Abarth 1300 vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (298 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 1295 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 1300 | 2013 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | Abarth | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 1300 | E |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 298 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 12.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4895 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2071 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1517 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2874 mm |
