1963 Abarth 1600 vs. 1950 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1963 Abarth 1600 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth 1600 (155 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 366 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1600.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Abarth 1600 (167 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1963 Abarth 1600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1600 | 1950 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | 1600 | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1963 | 1950 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2040 mm |