1963 Abarth 1600 vs. 1964 Singer Vogue III
To start off, 1964 Singer Vogue III is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Singer Vogue III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth 1600 (155 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1964 Singer Vogue III. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 1964 Singer Vogue III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Singer Vogue III weights approximately 348 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 1600 | 1964 Singer Vogue III | |
| Make | Abarth | Singer |
| Model | 1600 | Vogue III |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1592 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Top Speed | 240 km/hour | 148 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1092 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2570 mm |
