1963 Abarth 1600 vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1966 DAF Daffodil is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Abarth 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth 1600 (155 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Abarth 1600 weights approximately 78 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 1600 | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Abarth | DAF |
| Model | 1600 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2060 mm |
