1963 Abarth 1600 vs. 1969 Renault 4
To start off, 1969 Renault 4 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Abarth 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth 1600 (155 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1969 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 1969 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Abarth 1600 weights approximately 94 kg more than 1969 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 1600 | 1969 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Abarth | Renault |
| Model | 1600 | 4 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 745 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2410 mm |
