1963 Abarth 1600 vs. 1970 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1970 Jeep CJ5 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth 1600 (155 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1970 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 1970 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 286 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1600.
Because 1970 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Abarth 1600 (167 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1963 Abarth 1600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1600 | 1970 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | 1600 | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1970 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2060 mm |