1963 Abarth 1600 vs. 1979 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Abarth 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 66 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1600.
Because 1963 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1600 | 1979 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Abarth | Mitsubishi |
Model | 1600 | Colt |
Year Released | 1963 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2310 mm |